Cited By (since 1996): 3
;Correspondence Address: Suduc, A.-M.; VALAHIA University of Targoviste, Blvd. Carol I, No. 2, 130024, Targoviste, Dambovita, Romania
;Export Date: 13 December 2012
;Language of Original Document: English
;References: Shneiderman, B., A Second Path to HCI Innovation: Generative Theories Tied to User Needs, 2006. , http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~jacob/workshop/papers/shneiderman.pdf, from Computer Science Department at Tufts University;
Filip, F.G., (2004) Sisteme Suport pentru Decizii, , Bucharest: Technical Publishing House;
Suduc, A.M., Bizoi, M., Duta, L., Gorghiu, G., Interface Architecture for a Web-Based Group Decision Support System (2009) Studies in Informatics and Control, 18 (3), pp. 241-246. , Sept;
Schlungbaum, E., 1996 Model-based User Interface Software Tools -Current State of Declarative Models, , http://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/1853/3516/1/96-30.pdf, Technical Report 96-30, Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center. Georgia Institute of Technology, consulted on 12.04.2010;
Bosch, J., Bengtson, P.O., Assessing Optimal Software Architecture Maintability (2001) Fifth European Conference on Software Maintainability and Reengineering, pp. 168-176;
Shneiderman, B., Hochheiser, H., Universal Usability as a Stimulus to Advanced Interface Design (2001) Behaviour and Information Technology, 20 (5), pp. 367-376;
Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K., Ye, Y., Metadesign: Guidelines for Supporting Domain Experts in Software Development (2009) IEEE Software, 26 (5), pp. 37-44;
Lieberman, H., Paterno, F., Klann, M., Wulf, V., End-user Development: An Emerging Paradigm End-user development, , H. Lieberman, F. Paterno, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Berlin, Netherlands: Springer 9-15;
Mørch, A.I., Stevens, G., Won, M., Component-Based Technologies forEnd-User Development (2004) Comm. of the ACM, 47 (9), pp. 59-62;
Germonprez, M., Hovorka, D., Collopy, F., A Theory of Tailorable Technology Design (2007) Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8 (6), pp. 351-367;
Mcgill, T., Klisc, C., End-User Perceptions of the Benefits and Risks of End-User Web Development Selected Readings on Information Technology Management, , G. Kelley, Contemporary Issues, IGI Global 2009 212;
MØrch, A.I., (1998) Tailoring Tools for System Development, 10 (2), pp. 22-30;
Bevan, N., Classifying and Selecting U.X and Usability Measures (2008) Proceedings of Meaningful Measures: Valid Useful User Experience Measurement (VUUM), pp. 13-18. , 5th COST294-MAUSE Open Workshop, Reykjavik: Institute of Research in Informatics of Toulouse;
Suduc, A.-M., Bizoi, M., Filip, F.G., consulted on 12.04.2010 (2009) Aspecte legate de interfeţele omcalculator pentru reducerea riscurilor utilizǎrii sistemelor informatice, , http://www.ince.ro/Riscuri_Suduc.pdf, Eversion publised in 2010, Romanian Academy, National Institute of Economic Research;
Quesenbery, W., (2009) What Does Usability Mean: Looking Beyond 'Ease of Use', , http://www.wqusability.com/articles/more-than-ease-of-use.html, Retrieved from WQusability, consulted on 12.04.2010;
Bevan, N., Measuring Usability as Quality of Use (1995) Software Quality Journal, 4, pp. 115-150;
Bevan, N., (2009) Criteria for Selecting Methods in User-centred Design, , IUSED' 09 Workshop, INTERACT 2009. Uppsala, Sweden;
Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., (2005) Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, , (4th ed.). Addison-Wesley;
Suduc, A.-M., Filip, F.G., Riscuri ale utilizarii inadecvate a sistemelor informatice (2008) Studii si cercetari economice, p. 72. , (In Romanian);
Szameitat, A.J., Rummel, J., Szameitat, D.P., Behavioral and Emotional Consequences of Brief Delays in Human-Computer Interaction (2009) International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67 (7), pp. 561-570
Source: Scopus
; The following values have no corresponding Zotero field: